#Megaseg to shoutcast code#

ReadOnly portion of Libraries: Total=540K resident=0K(0%) swapped_out_or_unallocated=540K(100%) Thread 0 crashed with X86 Thread State (64-bit):

#Megaseg to shoutcast code#

Termination Reason: Namespace CODESIGNING, Code 0×1 The popularity of *lossy* AAC does not recommend ALAC as the best *lossless* format, per paragraph (2) above.) In fact, Wikipedia explains that AAC and ALAC are completely unrelated to each other. Shablovsky correctly describes AAC as a very popular lossy format, but erroneously equates this with lossless ALAC. (3) PCM and FLAC are both bit-perfect (lossless), but FLAC uses less than half the bandwidth. Even Apple does not sell music in ALAC format! Also, *all* online music stores that sell lossless downloads offer FLAC format, but almost none offer ALAC. (2) FLAC is becoming the universal standard for lossless music streaming, now employed by Tidal, Qobuz, Deezer, and YouTube Premium. (1) The official Xiph wiki says the Ogg PCM format “is at best incomplete and at worst completely broken.” Consequently, I do not know any music player that decodes Ogg PCM.

There are 3 reasons Ogg FLAC would be much more helpful than Ogg PCM:

FLAC is truly lossless, meaning that FLAC encoding followed by FLAC decoding produces audio that is bit-for-bit identical to the original. Respectfully, I believe you are mistaken. You responded on that PCM was a better option because FLAC is not truly lossless. I hope you will consider adding the option of Ogg FLAC encoding.